Manager by Design Year in Review: Top Article Series (part 1)

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

As we close out the year, here are the top series of articles published by Manager by Design in 2010.

Providing Positive Reinforcement:

A manager needs to provide positive reinforcement to encourage that employees keep doing the things that are going well, and perhaps do more of the things that work, and less the things that don’t.  Here are the Manager by Design articles related to Positive Reinforcement:

Examples of when to offer thanks and when to offer praise

“Thanks for your Hard Work” vs. “Thanks for your Good Work”

The Value of Providing Expectations: Positive reinforcement proliferates

Managers should provide focus on what’s going right and reward those behaviors

An example of tracking positive performance and praise of an employee in an employee performance log

Getting started on a performance log – stick with the praise

Using a Performance Log:

So many things happen when managing, it’s easy to forget what happened.  Or worse, it’s easy to remember the things that don’t matter as much.  What does matter is the performance of the employees.  Here are tips on keeping a performance log.  Remember — it should include the good stuff your employees are doing!

Helpful tip for managers: Keep a performance log

Important fields that an employee performance log should contain – Beginner Level

Important fields that an employee performance log should contain – Intermediate Level

Important fields that an employee performance log should contain – Advanced Level

Keeping a performance log – why not?

An example of tracking positive performance and praise of an employee in an employee performance log

Getting started on a performance log – stick with the praise

An example of how to use a log to track performance of an employee

Meetings:

Managers get invited to meetings all the time.  They also invite a lot of people to meetings too.  This means that meetings are important.  So what makes a good meeting?  Here are some articles by Manager by Design on the topic:

Criteria to generate a virtuous cycle for meetings

A leading indicator for team performance: Chart your meeting quality

Nine simple tips to make meetings more compelling

Making it a mandatory meeting sabotages the meeting

More reasons mandatory meetings are bad for you and bad for your team

The first step to getting out of the mandatory meeting cycle: Don’t call meetings if you were planning one-way communication

How to get out of what seem to be useless meetings

How to get out of really useless meetings

Happy New Year from Manager by Design!

Areas of focus in providing performance feedback based on direct observation: Tangible artifacts

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

I advocate that managers provide performance feedback using direct observation as much as possible.  In my previous articles, I recommend that managers set up practice environments and attempt to observe the performance directly to understand how an employee performs.  I feel that if this is not done in your work environment, this is bad management design.

There is a third form of “direct observation” a manager can use to provide performance feedback: tangible artifacts.

When an employee does their job, they create all sorts of “artifacts” – the things they are supposed to produce.  These can be things such as a project plan, software code, an analysis, an engineering schematic, a recording of a customer service call, a plate of food, etc.   I call these things tangible artifacts.  If you can print it out or touch it, then it is a tangible artifact.  So email would be considered a potential tangible artifact.  It is basically something that the person produces, whether digital or physical.

With tangible artifacts, the manager can provide performance feedback to the employee.  In many cases this is a great source of direct observation of the employee’s performance.  The manager can sit down with the employee, observe the artifact, and say what it is that is good or should be changed about future artifacts.   If it a call center agent, the manager can listen to a recent call by the agent, and discuss what was correctly done and what should be done differently.  The manager can also look at the “artifact” of what the agent did in the Customer Relation Management system, and provide feedback on this.  In a restaurant, the manager can taste the food and look at the presentation of the foot, and provide feedback on what the employee did that created the results.  Too much salt?

There are times when the artifact is so far off the mark, it is hard to determine what the employee did to create it.  If this is the case, then the observation of the artifact is not direct enough, and more direct observation is needed. Read more

When to provide performance feedback using direct observation: On the job

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

In today’s article, I continue my series of sources of direct observation managers can use to provide improved performance feedback.  Previously, I discussed how a manager can use practice sessions to provide specific and immediate feedback that dramatically increases the chances of high quality (and aligned) performance when it counts.

In today’s article, I discuss direct observation of the actual on the job performance as a source of performance feedback.

I advocate that managers should give performance feedback based on directly observed performance.  However, there are some guidelines that need to be observed in attempting this.

1. Give performance feedback during the performance only if it doesn’t ruin the performance

Read more

When to provide performance feedback using direct observation: Practice sessions

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

In my previous article, I discuss how managers tend to rely on indirect sources of information to provide feedback, rather than direct sources of information.  This creates a common mistake for managers.  They have to rely on some form of hearsay about the employee, and then they provide feedback on what the hearsay says.  It is only an assumption that the hearsay is correct, and, for this reason, employees generally don’t like getting “performance feedback” on such hearsay.  Also, the feedback tends to not make any sense.

In today’s article, I’d like to discuss how to increase the amount of performance feedback based on direct observation.

Here are three “sources” of direct observation that a manager can engage in:

  1. Practice of the performance
  2. Direct observation of behaviors while they are being performed
  3. Artifacts that provide evidence of the performance

Let’s talk about “practice of the performance.”  Not many managers consider this an option or utilize this, but this is a rich and useful source of providing performance feedback.  Imagine an employee needing to do a critical presentation.  The manager can improve the chances of success by scheduling a “practice” session of the presentation, in this case, “the performance”.

There are many advantages to this:

–The performer practices and gets better, both by practicing and by getting feedback

–The performer gets performance feedback that doesn’t get conflated with evaluation, since it isn’t the actual performance.  That is, the performance feedback is “safer.”

–The performance feedback is specific to the performance and immediately given.   You can stop the “practice” at any time and give feedback.  That makes it as specific and immediate as possible, and increases the chances that the feedback will be behavior-based.

–The performer and the manager are aligned in what the expected performance is

–The manager has “skin in the game” for the performance

And it doesn’t have to be only on “big events” like a presentation. You could have a manager sit down with a software developer to see how they perform some of the expected tasks in a non-production environment.  If the software is doing it right, the manager can say, “you’re doing it right.”  Performance feedback is provided and everyone is happy and aligned.   If there are some behaviors that can be corrected, the manager can provide that feedback. Read more

Manager by Design celebrates its one-year anniversary! Here are our top 10 articles so far!

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Manager by Design blog is celebrating its one-year anniversary this week!

We’ve published over 100 articles on People and Team Management, and started the discussion on how we can create better managers by design.

To celebrate, let’s count down the top 10 most popular articles of the year!

#10: When managers should praise and thank employees

#9: How to give positive feedback to your manager

#8: Examples of managers providing better performance feedback

#7: Reasons why discussing employee weaknesses is bad

#6: An example of praising an employee for doing a good job

#5: Example phrases for how to ask for feedback

#4: Let’s clarify what “dealing with ambiguity” means

#3: An example of giving specific and immediate performance feedback

#2: Examples of how to better discuss strengths and weaknesses

and the #1 most popular Manager by Design article in 2010 is. . .

#1: Good and Bad Examples of Performance Feedback

Thanks to all who follow and comment on the Manager by Design blog!  We have lots of great articles coming out for next year.

Keep reading Manager by Design for great people management tips and awesome team management tips, and we’ll keep developing the emerging field of management design!

What inputs should a manager provide performance feedback on?

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

If you are a manager, you get lots of inputs in regards to how your employee is performing.  Let’s do a quick review of some of these places:

  1. Direct Observation of Employee Behaviors
  2. Employee Output and Artifacts (emails, presentations, documents, code, tangible items)
  3. Peer Feedback
  4. Customer Feedback
  5. Employees’ Manager of Manager Feedback
  6. Metrics tied to employee output (customer satisfaction scores, number of items produced, number of sales made, number of contracts negotiated etc.)

Now, what does the manager do about it?  Does the manager provide performance feedback on all of these inputs?

No.

The manager should give performance feedback on only the top two – Direct Observation and Employee Output and Artifacts.

The remainder are all indirect sources of information about an employee’s performance. Let’s look at them:

Read more

When you add something to an employee’s plate, you need to remove something from the plate

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

A common practice for a manager is to ask their employee to do something for them.  We’ve seen this a lot.  One example:  The VP asks for some sort of recommendation, analysis, or revision on a strategy document that wasn’t expected before.  Now your team has to do this new thing.   It’s going to take time, effort, money.  Perhaps also teamwork, new processes, sourcing new information.  Lots of stuff.  This is one example, and I’m sure you can think of other times where your manager has said, “I need something from you. . .”

As the manager put in this situation, you agree to your VP to get this done and you decide to put your top performer Jackie on this.  Jackie is great at doing all sorts of things, and fulfilling this important request is something she can do.

So you go to Jackie and you say, “Jackie, I need to get a revised strategy document ready for the Vice President’s briefing next week. I know that you can do this.”

Jackie replies: “OK, I can do that.  I appreciate being trusted to do this.  However, I have the following things that I’m working on:

–I’m interviewing six candidates over the next three days

–I have meetings with our vendor to resolve issues with our contracts

–I need to present updates to our stakeholders on our top six projects in the next two days

–I have a deadline on creating a project plan for the project you assigned last week

–I’m filling in for Alex who is out of the office this week and next week

–I’m in the process of resolve a few issues that came in this morning from our operations team

–And I fly out early next week to meet with a potential new partner

(etc.)”

Clearly Jackie is a busy woman!  However, the manager replies, “I need you to get this done for our VP.”

Jackie replies, “OK, so what should I drop?”

Your answer: “You need to get it all done.”

Wrong answer.

Read more

The Value of Providing Expectations: Positive reinforcement proliferates

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

In my previous article, I noted how setting team expectations can help a manager identify when and how to provide corrective feedback.

There is another value to providing expectations to your team:  It allows you and your team to provide reinforcing feedback, and more of it.  Reinforcing feedback, also known as positive feedback, is much easier to give and receive than corrective feedback.  The key is to reinforce the right thing!

That’s where the expectation-setting comes in.  If the team expectations have been set, then they can be reinforced.  On the flip side, if no expectations have been set, then what gets reinforced will be generally random.  Some of good behaviors get reinforced, and some of bad behaviors get reinforced.

So if you set team expectations, then you and your team are much more likely to reinforce the desired behaviors. As previously written on this blog, the manager should be spending a good chuck of time reinforcing positive behaviors.

In the example I used in the previous article, was the manager set the following general team expectation:

The team will foster an atmosphere of sharing ideas

In this example, let’s say the team actually conducts a meeting where the various team members support each others’ ideas, and allowed everyone to provide their input.  The manager observes this and agrees that this reflects the expectation of “fostering an atmosphere of sharing ideas.”

Now the manager needs to reinforce this!  The manager can reinforce this in a few different ways.

1. Feedback to the group at the end of the meeting

At the end of the meeting the manager can say:

“This meeting reflected what we are looking for in fostering an atmosphere of ideas.  I saw people on the team asking others for their ideas, and I saw that ideas, once offered, weren’t shot down and instead were praised for being offered.  This allowed more ideas to be shared.  Thanks for doing this, and I like seeing this.”

Read more

The value of providing expectations: Performance feedback proliferates and becomes more artful

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

I’ve written several articles lately about providing expectations to your team on how to perform.  These articles describe how to increase the artfulness of providing expectations or setting expectations for behavior.  For example, the expectations should:

— reflect team input

— be set earlier rather than later

— include standards of performance where documented

–provided general guardrails of behavior

— should attempt to tie into the larger strategy

I’ve also written articles about how providing performance feedback to your team as a key management skill.  Now let’s take a look at an example of how providing expectations can help you in providing performance feedback.

1.   Performance feedback you provide happens more naturally, immediately and specifically

If you have provided expectations for how the team works together, and the guardrails of behavior are established in some form, you now have a context and standard of performance to start any performance feedback discussion when you see the need for someone to change what they are doing.  Let’s take a look at a performance feedback example:

Read more

The art of providing expectations: Tie the expectations to the larger strategy

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Providing expectations for how the team operates is an important skill for any manager or leader.  It doesn’t matter what level of manager you are, this is an important early step to establishing yourself as a manager and leader, and to set the right tone that reflects your values as a manager and your team’s values for how it executes its duties.

In previous posts, I’ve discussed the following artful elements of providing expectations:

Getting team input

Establishing expectations early

Using existing performance criteria for specific tasks

Providing general guidelines for behavior

Today I’ll discuss how to tie in the act of providing expectations with the larger strategy of the team and organization.

Providing expectations is different from defining the larger strategy of a team.  The larger strategy of a team or group dictates more what the team is working on and the resources it devotes to working on it to create a result greater than the individual work items.  The strategy should indicate what it is the team is actually producing.  The expectations should be consistent with the strategy and be the next layer down that translates more closely to the behaviors you expect and the areas the team should be working on.

So the expectations should feed into the larger strategy of the team or group.  If you don’t have a strategy, perhaps it’s time to get one!  It’s kind of a big topic, but let’s try to tackle it!

Let’s take a look at some examples of expectations that feed into a team or org strategy:

Read more

« Previous PageNext Page »