How to get out of really useless meetings

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

In my previous article, I propose a simple set of questions to determine the usefulness or uselessness of a given meeting.  In it, I explore what to do when you can answer “Yes” to one or more of the questions. Today, I explore what to do when you answer “Yes” to NONE of the questions.  That means it’s a really bad meeting and is worthless to you and probably a bunch of other people.  You should get out of it.

First, let’s review the five questions for determining the meeting’s usefulness:

Do the other attendees bring some value to me?  (Y/N)

Do I bring value to the other attendees? (Y/N)

Does the anticipated value of the meeting exceed what I can get accomplished if I don’t attend? (Y/N)

Will the meeting content get me un-stuck, make my work better, easier, more efficient, or compelling? (Y/N)

Will I have to do something differently in my job as a result of the meeting (Y/N)

Now think of a meeting that you are dreading to attend.  Why are you dreading it?  It’s because you answered “No” to all five questions.  You should get out of that meeting.  Here are some suggestions for how to do it: Read more

How to get out of what seem to be useless meetings

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

In previous blog entries, I propose a simple set of questions to determine the usefulness or uselessness of a meeting.  In today’s post, I’ll help you use this framework to get out of the useless meetings!   Ready?  Let’s go!

Ok, so the first thing to do is to become familiar with the set of questions you need to ask before accepting or walking into the meeting:

Do the other attendees bring some value to me?  (Y/N)

Do I bring value to the other attendees? (Y/N)

Does the anticipated value of the meeting exceed what I can get accomplished if I don’t attend? (Y/N)

Will the meeting content get me un-stuck, make my work better, easier, more efficient, or compelling? (Y/N)

Will I have to do something differently in my job as a result of the meeting (Y/N)

Now think of a meeting that you consider worthless and ask yourself these five questions in regards to this meeting.

Read more

A leading indicator for team performance: Chart your meeting quality

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

This is part of a series of posts designed to help break the mandatory meeting cycle.  The better you make the meetings, the less you’ll need to make them mandatory.  In my previous post, I described some basic criteria for what makes a meeting valuable and compelling to the attendees.  With these criteria, you can start to measure the quality of your meetings or any meeting you attend.

After a meeting, it is often ambiguous whether the meeting was a success.  The person calling the meeting may have obtained or shared the information they wanted to, but was it a compelling meeting?

Here are some ways to measure whether the meeting was compelling – for all participants.  You can then chart this out and create an index over time to create a leading indicator index of meeting quality that you or your team members attend. Read more

Criteria to generate a virtuous cycle for meetings

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

How do you make meetings more compelling? This is the latest of a series of blog posts discussing how to transition from making meetings mandatory to having an organization with meetings that people actually want to attend.

Many meetings are not compelling, they are just required.  Meetings should be required to be compelling. I previously discussed some alternatives to even calling a meeting – if it is unidirectional communication, then a meeting isn’t necessary. In today’s post, I discuss the criteria for what makes a meeting useful and compelling, and thus not required to be mandatory.

Your basic goal should not be attendance at the meeting.  Your goal should be instead to create value in the meeting, whether it is a large group meeting or a small team meeting.

Here is my set of criteria for what compels an employee to attend any meeting, whether or not it is deemed mandatory:

Read more

The first step to getting out of the mandatory meeting cycle: Don’t call meetings if you were planning one-way communication

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

In my previous posts (here and here), I discussed why calling “mandatory” meetings is a bad idea.  It doesn’t work at getting more attendance and it creates contempt for the meeting before it even started.  Yet, many meetings are still called “mandatory”.  This blog post is the first in a series dedicated to help you break the cycle of making meetings mandatory.

As explained in the prior posts, if you feel compelled to make a meeting mandatory, then it is an indicator that the meeting isn’t worth having.

So the first question should be: Is the meeting format even necessary? 

If you were planning to convey information to your team or group – and had no plans for additional interaction — then the meeting format isn’t necessary.  This is also true of other “guest speakers” you may have planned.  If they were planning to talk in front of the group – and nothing more—then the meeting isn’t necessary. Read more